We are all aware of Nancy(sell out whore) Pelosi and Jay(rat turd) Rockefeller along with Jane(twatzilla) Harman were informed about torture this country was using but did squat as is the norm with those on our side-my ass. Glenn Greenwald writes this excellent piece that explains in depth how because of these people's complicity any chance of accountability is gone.
Of course the Imbecile in charge claims executive privilege in the request from Congress for the records of the FBI interview with shooter Cheney about the leak of V. Plame-imagine that. That ain't news this is what the little fucktard does.
By the way we know Rove didn't show but do you remember the threat of arrest from the House Judiciary?? I sure do but I remember more all the other feeble ass threats and letters to appear or to turn over documents or what ever the fuck it is they wanted only to be told to go fuck your momma.
These two parties are one in the same for the most part and the Dims have a pattern of being even worse because they have betrayed us. You expect it from the Right because they know no other way at this time. It's not because of fear of reelection but something other. I personally think many have been threatened but what ever it may be it is pure evil! Sulphur is in the air.
What can be accurately stated is that these people do what ever they want when ever they want because they can and will continue to do just that. This is really fucked up. We are so screwed and speeches ain't gonna change shit.
Yes. I agree.
ReplyDeleteIn a small effort to inject a small bit of levity, there is hope for us yet. See:
http://www2.tbo.com/content/2008/jul/16/judge-rules-man-94-was-entrapped-sting/
that about covers it. I think if dems aren't killed outright (JFK-Wellstone) then they are certainly threatened in some fashion.
ReplyDeleteI suspect I'd be more excited about this, except I remember what happens when these guys do show up. The Senators or Representatives ask a series of clueless and incoherent questions, and then the witness leaves. Why Rove chose to avoid that is beyond me, but I suppose he just couldn't be bothered to show up. Given that there's no penalty for not showing up, who can blame him?
ReplyDeleteMaybe just maybe one will ask the right one while he's under oath for the first time. I wonder if the strongly worded letter has been sent to Rove for not showing.
ReplyDelete