tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1641923323486284057.post1886501686194086511..comments2024-02-15T10:41:10.376-07:00Comments on Outta the Cornfield: Pelosi Open to Prosecution ????One Flyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03772881642197609507noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1641923323486284057.post-19188531244329130332009-01-19T21:51:00.000-07:002009-01-19T21:51:00.000-07:00Dems have only had the powerof subpoena for two ye...Dems have only had the powerof subpoena for two years. Voices crying in the wilderness are seldom heard unless they are amplified by automatic gunfire. Pols are rarely leaders, even house speakers. We must demand justice and an eye for an eye in this instance. Nothing less than full prosecution will rebalance our tilted scales of justice.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1641923323486284057.post-1573789214486725582009-01-19T19:51:00.000-07:002009-01-19T19:51:00.000-07:00The other thing to keep in mind about Pelosi's see...The other thing to keep in mind about Pelosi's seeming reversal is that her branch of government isn't the one that will be doing the investigating any more. Now the executive branch, the DoJ in particular, will be doing that job. IOW, Pelosi is saying "Do the job I wasn't willing to do personally" to Obama.<BR/><BR/>Please note that this in no way means that I think the DoJ shouldn't investigate. It should. It should investigate anyone who willingly participated in illegal wiretapping, extralegal imprisonment, and torture. But then, I thought Pelosi should have impeached Bush for ordering those things when she had the power.Cujo359https://www.blogger.com/profile/10385213658828021737noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1641923323486284057.post-46772776996869311632009-01-19T18:15:00.000-07:002009-01-19T18:15:00.000-07:00I don't disagree but I find the reason lame when i...I don't disagree but I find the reason lame when it comes to treasonous dastardly deeds.<BR/><BR/>It probably comes from the judiciary Dusty and that's an assumption only. I'll be all boned up on that as conviction appears imminent.One Flyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11108040947857599256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1641923323486284057.post-79136997000679179702009-01-19T17:53:00.000-07:002009-01-19T17:53:00.000-07:00They've had eight years to do something, or at lea...They've had eight years to do something, or at least to more-or-less unanimously suggest that something be done. The obvious question people will ask is "Why now?" The obvious answer would seem to be, "Because it's no longer dangerous to them." At least, that's the most flattering obvious answer.Cujo359https://www.blogger.com/profile/10385213658828021737noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1641923323486284057.post-76145683851575206132009-01-19T10:23:00.000-07:002009-01-19T10:23:00.000-07:00I agree One Fly..plus, how will she determine who ...I agree One Fly..plus, how will she determine who gets tried and who doesn't?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06698117410778232102noreply@blogger.com